Guangzhou published poll results refiners tap water

Guangzhou public opinion research center announced the latest poll results refiners tap water, show based on rising costs for "the compensation prices" and promote water saving for "the ladder there", and people tend to the latter slightly. The survey also found that directly to tap water for diet of 61% water family, is down 9% since 2009.
Drinking tap water family
Rate down nearly ten percent
Guangzhou public opinion research center in early February, in "what water price" involves the related areas of the polls, visited 1004 citizen, and combined with the media and the Internet to express NBA Hats opinions of all parties, the public will study.
Polls show, water pollution caused by the safe problem of water, and has obtained the quality water need to pay for the higher cost, has become a social consensus. Polls showed that 65% of respondents agreed to "keep people in guangzhou pearl river no water to drink, to the water, the water pollution is inside the consequences of"; 55% of respondents thought "to get clean water, guangzhou people should pay more cost".
In addition, the survey shows 37% of Chinese family adjusted the water mode, diet water than tap water expensive purchase of bottled water, purifying water and home installation purifier is given priority to, clean water is the use of tap water. Direct to tap water for water percentage of families in the diet is down 9% since 2009, about 61%. Study, get high quality edible on the water, some citizens already polarized sunglasses spontaneous in pay higher cost.
More than half said they think
West river water diversion cost by the burden of government should be
The poll also showed that based on rising costs for "the compensation prices" and promote water saving for "the ladder there", two different nature, people don't tend to the former, the latter slightly tendency. West river water diversion for tap water supply caused by the increasing cost, 47% of most respondents said their own "is not willing to" pay more prices, said "would" 41%, while 12% said "hard to say".
In most people, it seems, is more public cost west water diversion, not personal cost. Therefore, to improve water diversion of west cost, 51% of the respondents thought should by "the burden of government", 44% of the people think that should by "citizen and government is collective burden", only 1% of the people think that should by "civil liability".
Survey also found that, for the price of the administrative departments of "pricing can reflect the wishes of public hearing" the problem, that "can't" person to 52%, by the end of 2008 is a big increase 25%, said the "power" only 33%, 15% of the respondents evaluation "hard to say". "In the water price adjustment process, commodity price departments for citizens to give good off" the problem, said "confident" for 35% of respondents, "no confidence" of as much as 52%.
see more:Shocked Russia home and abroad "repent reference books"
Ta kung pao: the United States policy trapped dilemma for global risk is pushed high